金枝欲孽2

开始抢人，新加坡移民黄金时机来了_我的网站

A |     新加坡必须维持开放性，不能给投资人有怀疑或提出质疑的空间。    NEW DELHI -- India’s top court on Tuesday refused to legalize same-sex marriages, passing the responsibility back to Parliament in a ruling that disappointed campaigners for LGBTQ+ rights in the world's most populous country. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also urged the government to uphold the rights of the queer community and end discrimination against them. Earlier this year, the five-judge bench heard 21 petitions that sought to legalize same-sex marriage. Chandrachud said there were degrees of agreement and disagreement among the justices “on how far we have to go” on same-sex marriages, but a majority of the judges agreed that the court cannot grant LGBTQ+ people the right to marry as that is a legislative function. “This court can’t make law. It can only interpret it and give effect to it,” the chief justice said, reiterating that it was up to Parliament to decide whether it could expand marriage laws to include queer unions.One of the petitioners, Mario da Penha, said it was “a day to be disappointed but not to lose hope.”“There's been tremendous work that has gone into these petitions, and many hopes and dreams of the queer community attached to them - to lead lives that most other Indians take for granted. The fact that the dream could not come to fruition today is a disappointment for all of us,” he said.He added that it was not yet clear if the court had set a mandate or timeline for Parliament to act. “Without that mandate, there is no pressure on Parliament to enact any legislation.”“There are queer couples today that are already families and in relationships, and are pillars of society. That they are not afforded the dignity and rights that they are due is deeply disappointing,” said Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers representing the petitioners. Legal rights for LGBTQ+ people in India have been expanding over the past decade, mostly as a result of the Supreme Court’s intervention. In 2018, the top court struck down a colonial-era law that had made gay sex punishable by up to 10 years in prison and expanded constitutional rights for the gay community. The decision was seen as a historic victory for LGBTQ rights, with one judge saying it would “pave the way for a better future."Despite this progress, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government resisted the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and rejected several petitions in favor. During the hearings, the government argued that a marriage is only between a biological male and a biological woman, adding that same-sex marriages went against religious values and that the petitions reflected only “urban elitist views”. Religious groups too had opposed same-sex unions, saying they went against Indian culture.Adish Aggarwala, the president of the Supreme Court bar association, said the court had done the right thing by recognizing that this was a job for Parliament, an argument the government also made during the hearings. Lawyers for the petitioners argued that marriage is between two people, not just a man and woman. They said concepts of marriage have gradually changed with time and laws should acknowledge that. By not recognizing such unions, the government was depriving same-sex couples of their right to equality enshrined in the constitution and rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples, from adoption and medical insurance to pensions and inheritance, they argued. “This court needs to push society to acknowledge same-sex marriage,” one of the lawyers said.Petitioners were hopeful that the Supreme Court could challenge the government’s position.But even as some of the justices urged that the state must make sure queer couples don't face harassment or discrimination in accessing basic needs, like opening a joint bank account, they stopped short of granting legal recognition to same-sex unions. Instead, the court accepted the government's offer to set up a special panel that will explore granting social and legal benefits to same-sex couples. Homosexuality has long carried a stigma in India’s traditional society, even though there has been a shift in attitudes toward same-sex couples in recent years. India now has openly gay celebrities and some high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues. According to a Pew survey, acceptance of homosexuality in India increased by 22 percentage points to 37% between 2013 and 2019.But same-sex couples often face harassment in many Indian communities, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian.India is estimated to have at least 2.5 million LGBTQ+ people, according to government figures from 2012. However, gay rights activists and global estimates believe they number at least 10% of the population, or more than 135 million.In May, Taiwan became the first jurisdiction in Asia to recognize same-sex marriages. In July, Nepal's Supreme Court issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages for the first time. It is still not clear when the court would make its final decision on the case.。新加坡的资源稀少，人力是唯一的资源，人才引进是新加坡重要的前进策略。——新加坡人力资源部长陈诗龙要快速发展，人才储备是关键。哪里有年轻能干的劳动力，哪里的经济才会有活力。众所周知，新加坡一直坚持“人才建国”战略。

B | 据新加坡的人口白皮书，到2030年，预计该国的人口将达到650万至690万人。在这一规模下，公民人口预计将由360万到380万人组成，永久居民将保持在50万至60万人之间，其余则为非居民。按现在的数据计算，也就是说，新加坡要在7年时间内增加58万-98万人，平均每年增加8万-14万人。

C | 从2023年的人口分布来看，新加坡公民人数为大约361万人，实际上已经达到2030年的公民人数预期，也就是360万至380万人之间。但是这其中有19.1%的公民年龄为65岁以上。不难看出，新加坡正逐步迈入深度老龄化社会。

D | 人口减少最直接的体现在于劳资市场出现人荒，本地企业叫苦连天，请不到高端人才。企业们都已经焦头烂额，甚至因为人荒的问题，被迫缩减了生意。

E | 与此同时，新加坡2023年仅有30,500名婴儿出生，生育率跌至0.97，创下历史最低点。

F | 如果新加坡继续保持当前的低生育率，且不引进新移民的情况下，新加坡的人口总数将会从2025年起减少。各种因素综合影响下，新加坡的经济发展被大大制约了。因此，新加坡政府坚持对外来人口持开放和欢迎的态度，并在发布了一系列利于移民的新政策。顶级专才准证为进一步吸引全球顶尖人才，新加坡人力部于2022年推出为期5年的新工作准证“顶级专才准证”（Overseas Networks and Expertise Pass），简称ONE Pass。并从2023年1月起，开始全面推行。新加坡顶级专才准证的侧重点，在于该准证设立的目的是吸引顶尖人才，扩大新加坡的经济规模，为本地就业创造更多机会。它允许符合条件的申请人同时在新加坡的多家公司创办、经营和工作，从而提供就业灵活性，并且不受互补专才评估框架COMPASS的限制。据悉，从2023年发布到今年年初，新加坡就发放出去了4200份准证。申请要求1、主申过去一年的固定月薪需要达到3万新币，或来到新加坡本地后会赚取相同的固定月薪收入；2、主申需要证明自己在市值超过5亿美元或年收入超过2亿美元的企业担任要职至少一年时间；3、如果在文化艺术、体育、科学与科技、学术等方面有卓越成就的个人，可以不必满足月收入门槛要求。除了以上的条件，再无任何要求，不要求学历、语言、投资…就可以拿到土豪们需要花1亿人民币（13O/13U）才能拿到的新加坡长期居留。

G | 新加坡就业准证EP“自雇EP”项目是通过注册一间新加坡公司，担任公司股东或董事或高级人员，向新加坡人力部申请获得就业准证，在公司运营达到一定规模及持有准证2年后向新加坡移民局提交永久居民（PR）申请，申请人和家人由EP准证来申请PR的方式获得新加坡绿卡。移居新加坡的诸多方式中，自雇EP以其周期短、文件简单、无语言和年龄要求等优势从诸多项目中脱颖而出。黄循财总理还在群众大会上表示，要打造更亲商的环境，减少规则和流程，简化规定和程序。如此一来，外国人在新加坡开公司或许更方便，拿下EP的速度也会更快。申请条件1、在新加坡成功注册公司并运营2、申请人为自己匹配高管级别以上的职位3、配置5,000新币以上的月薪，薪金根据公司运营时间及情况进行调整4、根据COMPASS计分：从2023年9月1日起，新加坡EP工作准证申请将采取计分制度(即COMPASS)，人力部将通过此制度综合评估申请者与企业的申请资格。申请者必须通过框架的四个项目(薪水、学历、企业员工多元化、支持聘用本地人)取得至少40分，以符合申请资格新加坡全球投资者计划虽然去年3月新加坡提升了全球投资者计划的门槛，但申请数量却并没有因此减少，反而吸引了更多有意在新加坡扩大业务或建立区域总部的企业主申请。“全球商业投资者计划（Global Investor Programme，GIP）”是由新加坡经济发展局（EDB）推出的永久居留权计划，旨在吸引高净值个人和企业家在新加坡进行投资，为他们提供获得新加坡永久居民身份的快速路径。据新加坡经济发展局透露，截至去年年底，新加坡全球投资者计划的投资者已通过经批准的基金向新加坡公司投资了9亿5000万元。申请方案方案A：投资不少于新币1000万元建立新的商业实体或扩大现有的业务营运。方案B：投资不少于新币2500万元于主要投资新加坡企业的全球商业投资者计划基金。方案C：投资不少于新币2亿元于一家成立于新加坡的新或现有单一家族理财办公室。其中至少5000万元必须投资在四个类别，且须在批准函发出之日起的12个月内完成。

H | 放开留学生申请PR条件普通人想要成为新加坡PR，进而成为公民，简单途径之一就是“教育移民”。

I | 接受本地教育越早、时间越长，获得新加坡PR或公民身份的机会就越大。因此，不少留学生可能会选择在毕业后留在新加坡。而新加坡政府为了更好更多的留住这批学生，今年也做出了相应调整：之前，留学生若想申请新加坡的永久居留权（PR），必须同时满足两大条件：在新加坡连续居住满两年至少在一次国家级别考试中取得及格成绩（包括O水准、A水准或PSLE等）。然而，根据最新的政策调整，第一个居住年限的条件已被取消。现在，只要学生前往新加坡留学，并成功通过至少一项国家级考试，即可具备申请新加坡PR的资格。

J | 这一变化不仅简化了申请流程，也为更多国际学生提供了更早实现新加坡永久居留梦想的机会。注意：满足这两项条件只是具备申请资格，并不代表学生可以直接获得PR资格。此外，新加坡最近还推出了新的陪读规定，允许父亲或祖父母陪同孩子一起在新加坡读书。这些新政无疑会进一步增强新加坡作为教育和生活目的地的吸引力。未来，预计将会有更多国际学生及其家庭选择新加坡进行教育和长期发展。对国人来说，作为发达国家中少有的华人社会，新加坡有着距离近、无时差、无居住要求、中英双语自由通行、低税负、低犯罪率等无可比拟的移民优势，能轻松实现“一天两国”，已然成为亚洲移民者移居的不二之选。而现在随着新加坡抢人大战开始，对于有意向移民新加坡的小伙伴来说，更是申请的黄金时期。心动不如行动，赶紧挑选适合自己的方法途径吧。

Current article:http://n4iktz1.cengzaodengchawonin.cyou/list_v8h/jz4.html

Published on:00:00:00